Pd5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DRG 13 1247, preserved at the former Railway School
premises in Warsaw, is the only surviving machine of this class; photo taken
on March 15, 2004… … and another view of the same machine. Its current
service number Pd5-17 is fictitious. DRG Class 1310-12, side drawing © Lokomotiv-Revue (from TB
vol.1) In Warsaw, 13 1247 was not displayed in a
photographer-friendly manner… This photo was taken on KPEV
S6; LHW catalogue card from my collection. 13 1247 at the Skierniewice depot; it seems
that restoration has begun. September 19, 2011. Factory photo of a S6. From my collection. KPEV Breslau 197 (Linke-Hofmann 351/1906), location and date
unknown. After the war this locomotive went to Belgium and was re-numbered
6605, to become SNCB 66.05 in 1946.
Source: Die Lokomotive
September 1906 via www.de.wikipedia.org.
An unidentified S6, location and date
unknown. Source: Die Lokomotive September 1906. 1000th locomotive built by Linke-Hofmann was an S6, delivered to KPEV in 1913. Later it was re-numbered
13 1280 by DRG; withdrawal date is
not known. Factory photo, source: Die Lokomotive April 1915. KPEV Breslau 624 (Linke-Hofmann 643/1909), location and date
unknown. Postcard from my collection. This locomotive was taken over by DRG and re-numbered 13 1089 in 1925;
withdrawn in 1927. |
Prussian
express locomotive S2, which appeared in 1890, became the starting point for
the entire family of machines with 2-2-0 axle arrangement. It was designed by
August von Borries in a response to a need for faster and more powerful
locomotives for express trains. S2 remained basically an experimental
machine, but its further derivatives – S3, S4 (first locomotive in the world
built in series with Schmidt superheater), S51 and S52
– were built in quite large numbers, over 1600 examples combined, and
dominated KPEV express trains. All but 104 S4s had compound engines,
as von Borries – drawing on British and American experiences – viewed this
layout superior due to better economy. Despite
increasing demands concerning tractive power and speed, KPEV decided
to maintain the 2-2-0 axle arrangement. Robert Garbe,
who designed the next express locomotive for this service, had different
ideas concerning economy. His approach was more general; he rejected compound
engines, arguing that lower coal consumption did not make up for higher
manufacture and maintenance costs. On the other hand, he was a great advocate
of steam superheating. After initial experience with express singles (class
S4), new class S6 was ordered and supplies began in 1906. They were the
heaviest machines in Europe with only two driven axles (it is worth reminding
here that in 1906 KPEV received first P8 passenger locomotives with
three driven axles), but increase of tractive effort was not impressive: 6.9 tonnes, as compared to 6.2 – 6.4 tonnes
of S51 and S52. Production was terminated in 1913,
after 584 examples had been built by Linke-Hofmann,
Henschel and Humboldt. First engines
had chamber-type superheater in the smoke box, but
this proved unreliable and troublesome in service and was quickly replaced by
Schmidt-type one, which was becoming standard. Also oblique front wall of the
driver’s cab, intended to reduce drag, but distorting forward view, was
replaced in 1908 by more typical flat one. Initial operational experience was
far from unequivocal. Some considered these engines adequate for tasks they
had been designed for. Other complained of uneasy running – not particularly
surprising with only two driven axles, despite drivers 2100 mm in diameter,
introduced in order to reduce rpm; in fact, 2200 mm drivers were initially
planned. Due to comparatively light balancing masses, intended to reduce
locomotive weight, excessive vibrations were commonplace. Some of these
shortcomings were rectified by minor modifications, especially after
acceptable weight on drivers was increased in 1910. In those times, when
external appearance of locomotives was also appreciated and discussed, S6 –
with its two large-diameter drivers shifted backwards and large clearances
between wheels – was considered not well-balanced and somehow
ancient-looking, especially in comparison with modern engines. It was,
however, steam superheating that made it modern. After
WWI, at least 442 machines survived in Germany, but only 286 were taken over
by new Deutsche Reichsbahn and designated class 1310-12.
Despite their comparatively young age and large number, they were soon
considered obsolete and inadequate for increasing tasks. Due to mounting supplies
of new, standardized locomotives, they were fairly quickly withdrawn from
service, the last surviving only until 1931. 42 machines taken over by
Belgian railways served until 1956. Two S6s briefly served with Italian FS
as class 553; they were withdrawn in the 1920s. PKP
took over 81 ex-KPEV machines, designating them Pd5. They were given
service numbers from 1 to 79; two of five machines used in Gdańsk were not
given consecutive PKP service numbers and were designated Pd5-1Dz and
Pd5-2Dz (Dz standing for ‘Danzig’). Most of them were used with light express
and passenger trains, first mainly in north-western Poland (Toruń and
Poznań), then also in Warsaw and Wilno. Later they also ran with local
trains. They remained in service until 1939. According to LP, 49
machines, captured by Germans, were impressed into DRG and saw a brief
service there as class 135 (this designation had formerly been
assigned to ex-KPEV class S4, withdrawn much earlier). 22 examples
were taken by the Soviets; some were converted to the 1524 mm track (the
only engines with two driven axles that underwent such conversion!), but
retained their Polish service numbers, written in Russian script. No details
on their service history are known, apart from the fact that eleven fell into
German hands after Fall Barbarossa; some of them were impressed into
service with Ostbahn and retained their ‘original’ service numbers.
One engine (Pd5-30, Linke-Hofmann 620/1908), evacuated in 1939 to
Lithuania, was impressed into the LG class K5.2 with service number
121; it fell into Soviet hands in 1940. The fate of nine Pd5s remains
unknown. After
WWII, 37 machines returned to PKP and were re-designated Pd5-1 through
37. According to KMD, Pd5-7, -19, -28 and -29, in bad condition, were
written off before 1948. The last example in service, Pd5-9 (pre-war Pd5-25,
later DRG 13 516, Linke-Hofmann 616/1908), was written off on
April 8, 1958. Several (probably ten) were transferred to various industrial
establishments (most of them as stationary heating machines – obviously they
would not make good industrial engines!), but none has been preserved. One S6
can, however, still be seen in Poland. This machine (ex-KPEV Altona
656, then DRG 13 1247, Linke-Hofmann 934/1912, the last of this
class in active DRG service) was converted into an educational exhibit
before WWII in Braunschweig and used for this purpose – with boiler casing
partly removed – until the outbreak of the war. Somehow it found its way to
Warsaw, when it was plinthed at the former Railway School premises. In April
2010 this engine was handed over to the PSMK railway fan society and
transferred (by road) to the Skierniewice depot. It had never served with PKP
and its current service number Pd5-17 (previously Pd5-5) is purely
fictitious. This is the only S6 that has survived until today; unfortunately
its overall condition is not entirely satisfactory and many details are
missing. Class
S6 quickly disappeared from service in Germany, as its basic layout was
obsolescent almost from the very start. It is a little surprising that KPEV
insisted on express machines with two driven axles that had neither good
running qualities nor enough tractive effort; in fact, another class of such
machines that remained in production for slightly longer – S7, built between
1902 and 1914 (237 examples) – had the 2-2-1 axle arrangement and tractive
effort equal to that of S51. Major progress came only with class
S10, which appeared in 1911.
Main technical data
1)
After WWII. 2)
With 22D2 tender. References
and acknowledgments
-
Monographic article by Paweł Terczyński (SK
vol. 12/2001); -
AP, TB vol. 1, LP; -
www.holdys.pl/tomi (website
by Tomisław Czarnecki); -
KMD vol. 1/2000 (survey of the
13 1247). |