Ol101 and Ol102
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
S.68 at the Varshavskiy station
in St.Petersburg; photo taken in August 2001 by
Igor Bosnyakov (from www.parovoz.com
– thanks for permission!).
Side drawing of class S from the monograph
mentioned in references.
This postcard from my collection (dated 1916) shows
the S.108 from the Severo-Donetskaya
railway (Sormovskiy
1690/1912). The
inscription in old Russian reads ‘Greetings from the road’.
This photo captures the atmosphere of days from the
past: S.224 with the funeral train of Cheka leader M.S.Uritsky,
location unknown, 1918. Source: www.commons.wikimedia.org.
S.833, built by Sormovskiy in 1913, location and date
unknown. Source: Die Lokomotive
November 1921. |
After
Poland regained independence in 1918, most locomotives impressed into service
with newly-formed Polish state railways PKP
were of either German or Austrian origin. Russian locomotives, with the
exception of class Tp104 (formerly OW, or OB in Russian
script), were few and most of them were written off fairly soon. There were
several reasons for this, both technical and political, but the result is
that information on their service in Poland is usually hard to find and data
from various sources are often contradictory. Classes Ol101 and Ol102 provide
a good example: first of all, even their very identity is not certain... Everything
began in early 20th century, when Russian railways formulated a
need for a passenger locomotive faster and more powerful than classes P and D
(П and Д in Russian script, axle arrangement 2-2-0) or later
class N (H, 1-3-0) then in service. New engine was to be fired by low-grade
domestic coal or even wood, which called for large firebox, so the 1-3-1, or Prairie, axle arrangement was chosen,
as a Pacific would have been too
long for existing turntables. Five prototypes were ordered from Sormovskiy Zavod of
Nizhny Novgorod and all were completed in late 1910. They featured large, Belpaire-type firebox with grate area of 3.8 sq.m, for the first time in Russian design practice
located above the rear idle axle. Large, four-axle tender was designed by Putilovskiy Zavod of
Petersburg and was later widely used also with other classes. After service
tests new locomotive was considered satisfactory and ordered in quantity as
class S (C in Russian script); until 1918, 678 examples were built by four
factories (Sormovskiy,
Luganskiy,
Kharkovskiy
and Nevskiy).
It should be noted here than in Russia each railroad had its own numbering
system, so some service numbers were used more than once (for example,
designations S-1 through S-13 were used four times each!). Class S quickly
found widespread use and became the principal passenger engine in Russia and
then in the Soviet Union, at least until late 1920s, when more powerful class
Su appeared in large numbers (together with improved SUM,
almost 2700 examples were delivered until 1951). Despite similar designation,
SU was a new locomotive, only broadly based on its predecessor.
Basically intended to haul fast and comparatively light trains, these engines
hauled almost anything they could manage, fired with whatever was at hand,
especially during the Civil War and immediately afterwards. Despite such
rough conditions, few were withdrawn before WWII; in November 1942, 655
examples were still in the NKPS
(Ministry of Transport) rosters. Withdrawal of class S from line service
started in late 1950s and was completed until 1964; some survived for several
years more as switchers, others were sold to industrial operators or served
as stationary boilers. Most probably the last operational machine was S.16,
sold to a colliery in 1948 and written off in 1972. In 1913 a variant of this engine was ordered
for the 1435 mm gauge Warsaw-Vienna railroad from Kolomenskiy Zavod and designated class SW
(CB – the upper index stood for the railroad name; factory type
145). Although based on the original class S, it differed in many respects.
Zara-Krauss lead truck was replaced by the Krauss-Helmholtz truck and rear
idle axle, previously rigidly fixed in the frame, was supplanted by the
Bissel truck. This allowed for negotiating tighter curves. In order to match
different vehicle gauge, boiler was lowered by 150 mm. Boiler pressure was
reduced from 13 to 12 bar, smokebox was increased in length and Hardy-type
vacuum brakes replaced Westinghouse units. Nine engines were supplied in 1914
and six in 1915 (service numbers 50 through 64), but their service with the
original operator was very short. As fortunes of war turned against Russia
and Warsaw had to be evacuated, they were taken and converted to the 1524 mm
gauge. Later they served in Russia and most were withdrawn before 1960. SW
was the starting point for the above-mentioned classes SU and SUM,
later built in quantity, as well as SUT (first production variant
of SU) and SUR prototypes, built in 1948. Post-war
agreements stipulated that all SWs should be returned to Polish
authorities, but this was never done. According to several sources (see class
list published at www.holdys.pl/tomi
– website maintained by Tomisław Czarnecki), these very machines were to have become PKP class Ol101. On the other hand,
Poland did acquire a number of original class S machines; the above-mentioned
website gives their number as eleven, of which ten were immediately sold (or
handed over) to Latvian Latvijas Dzelzcels (LDZ)
railways and the last one, after an unsuccessful attempt to convert it to the
1435 mm gauge, was finally written off and scrapped (class S design did not
facilitate easy conversion to a smaller gauge – in fact the entire frame
should have been modified!). This single machine might be designated either
Ol101 or Ol102. In my humble opinion, the latter supposition may be
justified: first, there is no other candidate for the Ol102 designation (next
in turn is Ol103 – this designation was briefly used for the MÁV class 324), and second, there was
a tendency to assign different service designations to individual variants of
the same basic design (e.g. various version of Russian class O became Tp102
through Tp105). This is, however, just a conjecture. Russian
sources, in particular the monograph by A. Nikolskiy,
give different information. According to them, seven class S engines did
receive PKP service designations,
namely Ol101-1 (S.283), Ol101-2 (S.860), Ol101-3 (S.311), Ol101-4 (S.838),
Ol101-5 (S.828), Ol101-6 (S.848) and Ol101-7 (S.41); due to the
above-mentioned ambiguity concerning numerals, their manufacturers and
serials cannot be determined. After their transfer to Latvia in 1923 and
1924, they were re-designated class Csk
and given service numbers 144 through 150 (later to be supplemented by two
additional ex-Russian machines, C.43 and C.69, which became Csk 151 and Csk
152). All nine were taken over by NKPS
after the annexation of Latvia in 1940. LP confirms seven machines
serving briefly with PKP, transferred to LVD in 1928 (which
seems justified, given that they had been assigned PKP service
numbers). According to this source, there were two Ol102s that remained in
service until 1939; no details are available. The identity question therefore
remains open. Only
one example has survived until today. S.68 (Nevskiy 1992/1913), sold to
industry in 1960, finally ended up as a stationary boiler in Moscow. Due to
an enormous effort of railway fans, it was saved from scrapping in early
1980s (thanks to the deliberate subterfuge that this very engine was in fact
S.245, which had hauled the train carrying Lenin and his staff to Moscow in
1918). Beautifully restored, although not to the working order, it was first
kept at the VNIIZhT
(railway transport institute) premises in Moscow and later transferred to St.
Petersburg, where it is currently on display at a railway station with the
original S.68 designation. Main technical data –
Russian class S
1)
See main text. Main technical data –
Russian class SW
1)
See main text. 2)
SW was coupled with a different tender
than S, with Diamond-type trucks. 3)
Later Westinghouse. References
and acknowledgments
-
Steam locomotives, class S
by Alexander S. Nikolskiy (Victoria Moscow, 1997 –
in Russian); -
LOZD vol. 1, LP, -
http://scado.narod.ru/rail
(website by Vyacheslav Sokolov). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
