Os24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Os24-10 (in fact most probably Os24-7), Another picture of the only surviving Os24, taken on ...and yet another, taken on Os24 drawing by M.Ćwikła, from SK
vol.6/1999. Os24-59. My data give ‘location unknown, October 1959’,
but judging from the service number this is a pre-war picture. Photo from my
collection. |
Steam
locomotives with the 2-4-0 axle arrangement were first designed and built in
the USA, but never achieved much popularity there; from somehow awkward Centipede of 1855 to five machines
supplied by Baldwin to Ferrocarriles
Nacionales de México
in 1935, only about 600 were built, not many by American standards. They were
known as Mastodons or simply Twelve-Wheelers. This layout
eventually found much more favor with European railways. As it combined
considerable tractive effort with moderate axle load and satisfactory running
qualities, it was destined primarily for passenger traffic in mountain
regions with comparatively weak tracks. No wonder, thus, that one of the main
protagonists of such machines were the Austro-Hungarian railways and later
their descendants, ČSD
and MÁV; beside these,
many machines of this layout were purchased by Spanish RENFE. In
1915, StEG (Maschinenfabrik der
priv. österreichisch-ungarischen Staatseisenbahnen-Gesellschaft) of When
the First Locomotive Factory in Poland
(later known as Fablok) was founded in Chrzanów in May 1919, technical
assistance was provided by StEG; no
wonder, thus, that Austrian designs were favored. Although first five Ok22
passenger locomotives had already been supplied by Hanomag, it was felt that
these machines, with axle load of 17 tonnes, were not suitable for many
railway lines in southern and eastern Os24
locomotives, large and impressive, were pre-war PKP’s pride and glory, at least until the end of 20s, when new
Pu29s and later Pt31s made their appearance. Impressive they were, mainly due
to high-pitched boiler (firebox had to be located very high with such axle
arrangement) and quite pleasant silhouette; they were not, however,
trouble-free. Despite their designation, they were initially used mainly with
express trains, but soon it was found that, just as their Austrian ancestors,
they had a pronounced tendency to snaking and uneasy running at higher
speeds. Moreover, it soon turned out that passing tight curves resulted in
frame fractures between cylinders and first drivers. Poor manufacture quality
was suggested as the main reason; it was also argued that valve gear design
was faulty and resulted in excessive dynamic load on rods and frame. No
modifications were, however, undertaken. On the other hand, some new design
concepts were tested on these engines. Two (Os24-19 and Os24-20) had their
typical valve gears replaced by the Lentz-type poppet-valve ones. Four
(Os24-16, Os24-17, Os24-18 and Os24-20) were fitted with Dabeg feedwater heaters
and pumps, driven by third pair of drivers. Last two examples had
Worthington-type feedwater pumps. Despite certain advantages (mainly
concerning economy), none of these novelties was accepted for widespread use. All
machines of the Os24 class were used in eastern and south-eastern In
1939, two machines (Os24-17 and Os24-31) were destroyed and ten were taken
over by the Germans. In 1941 they were re-numbered 33 201 through 210 – their
Austrian counterparts were designated class 330 (ex-570) and 331
(ex-113) – and served mainly with Ostbahn.
The remaining 48 engines were taken over by the Soviets. According to PNPP, thirty were converted to the
1524 mm track; in 1941 they were evacuated eastwards and never returned. The
remaining 18 were captured by Germans after Fall Barbarossa. They were in a very poor condition, so only six
were repaired and restored in service (DRG
33 211 through 216). Some unserviceable Os24s, brought by DRG to Just
as before the war, all fifteen machines of this type were used in eastern Main technical data
1)
Some pre-war sources give 25D24. 2)
Some sources give about 217 m2, which is
incorrect. References and acknowledgments
Comprehensive
account of this class history and design can be found in the monographic
article by Pawel Terczynski in SK vol.6/1999. Detailed description can
also be found in PNPP. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||