|

ŽSR 771.054-4, photographed at Skalite,
Slovakia, on March
7, 2003.

T669 drawing by ČKD,
from AV
vol.2

This S200-284, operated by NZGTK,
was photographed at the Piast
colliery on March 24, 2003…

…while this S200-276, also from NZGTK, photographed at the same location on May
5, 2003, displays a new livery. Both photos by A.Kabała (www.lokomotywy.republika.pl – thanks a lot for
permission!).

S200-233, PTKiGK Rybnik,
photographed near Knurów on October
6, 2006.

S200-254, PTKiGK Rybnik,
photographed in Jastrzębie Zdrój on October
20, 2006...

...and S200-295 from the same company, heading for
a spoil bank near Borynia
colliery; photo taken on the same day.

S200-301, STK
(ex 770 540-3), photographed in Krotoszyn on June
9, 2008.

T669 0085, ČSD,
Czech railway museum, Lužna u Rakovnika, June 14, 2008.
|
Although
locomotives designated S200 were built in Czechoslovakia
and are used in Poland,
their origin can be traced in the USA
and the USSR.
To
begin with, during the first half of 1945 68 heavy diesel switchers with
electric transmission from the ALCO
RS family were supplied to the USSR.
These machines of Bo’Bo’ layout had axle load of almost 30 tons, very high
for European and especially Russian standards, so they were supplied in a
modified six-axle (Co’Co’) version. Designated Da20 (Дa20
in Russian script) and later simply Da for Diesel-ALCO, they were much more modern than
contemporary Soviet counterparts, so their clones were promptly ordered in
quantity as TE1 (road diesels built in Kharkov
between 1947 and 1949) and TEM1 (switchers built in Bryansk
between 1958 and 1968). TEM1 was further developed into what finally became
the most prolific family of Russian diesel switchers; its offspring includes
the TEM2, used in Poland
in fairly large numbers and designated SM48 (described under a separate
entry).
The
demand for heavy switchers in the USSR
was much higher than capabilities of national locomotive industry, so large
orders were also placed with Czechoslovakian locomotive industry. ČKD factory of Prague
had supplied considerable number of ChME2 (ЧМЭ2 in Russian
script) machines, roughly equivalent to Czechoslovak classes T435 and T458 (522
examples purchased by the USSR
between 1958 and 1965). These locomotives were considered very reliable, but
too light for most tasks, so there was a demand for a switcher with the
tractive effort of TEM1 and reliability of ChME2. Although preliminary drafts
of such machine were prepared in a hotel room in Moscow,
in conditions hardly resembling a design office, they resulted in a
successful locomotive that remained in production for over thirty years, with
8200 examples built. In Czechoslovakia
they were designated T669 (after 1995, class 770 or 771, depending on the
particular variant). Vast majority (7455 machines) went to the USSR,
where they served as the ChME3 class; they still remain in service in the
CIS. 402 examples went to ČSD and
national industrial operators and the rest were exported to Albania
(61, HSH class T669, delivered in
six small batches between 1968 and 1990), India
(12, for two steel plants), Iraq
(100, class DES3100), Syria
(25, class LDE1500) and Poland.
T669
or ChME3 makes an interesting comparison with its Soviet counterpart TEM2, as
they both were developed from the same basic ALCO’s design. They are similar in appearance and have similar
ratings. In general, Czechoslovak machine is considered more reliable and
having better overall workmanship quality, while the Soviet one is more
robust and suited for operation in extreme weather conditions. Due to
similar, slow-running (750 rpm) engines, both developed from American design,
they also sound much the same – and loud. It is perhaps worth mentioning here
that the crowning achievement of heavy diesel switcher design at the ČKD was the ChME5, an eight-axle
(Bo’Bo’Bo’Bo’), 2000-hp machine. It was intended to build 2000 locomotives of
this class for the USSR
until the year 2000 (Communists always liked round figures), but in 2000
neither Czechoslovakia
nor the USSR
existed…
Both
TEM2s and T669s were purchased for Polish railways. Contrary to the Soviet
machine, used both by PKP (as SM48)
and various industrial operators, Czechoslovak switchers were purchased
mainly for sand railways in the Upper Silesia. These
machines were supplied between 1966 and 1990 and classed S200. The reason for
this odd practice (other locomotives used by industrial operators usually
retained their factory type designation) is that 62 examples went to ‘Lenin’
steel works, which had their own system. All diesel locomotives were
designated there by an alphanumerical symbol beginning with S: for example,
S100 corresponded to the PKP class
SM41 and S400 – to SM42. This was later extended over an entire class. In
all, 143 examples were purchased. Two more (S-229 and S-230), damaged en
route to Poland
in 1977, were not delivered and remained in Czechoslovakia,
becoming T669.0109 and T669.0540, respectively; their Polish designations
were then used again. Further two (S-2140 and S-2141) of 1989 were also not
delivered – for reasons unknown to me – and became T669.0538 and T669.0539,
respectively. Despite rather obsolescent basic design, Polish S200s will
probably remain in operation for a long time, hauling heavy trains on
industrial lines and sidings; they had been designed for such tasks. Largest
fleets are currently operated by PTKiGK Rybnik company – 43 examples (2006) and NZGTK (now NZTK) company of Nowy Bieruń– 14 examples (2005).
They are encountered mainly in the Upper Silesia, but
recent extension of private operators’ activity will most probably send them
to various other parts of Poland.
In
November 2006 a second-hand Czech machine appeared in Poland,
namely 770.540-3 (ex T669.0540 – initially intended for Poland,
but never delivered, operated by Doly
Nástup Tušimice, ČKD
10175/1977). This locomotive was purchased by STK, a private operator specializing in the out-of-gauge cargo,
and is currently designated S200-301. Further purchases may follow.
Modernizations of these
locomotives were focused mainly at replacing obsolete and uneconomical
K6S310DR engines with modern units. One machine (S-269) was modernized by PTKiGK
Rybnik in 1996 and fitted
with MTU 12V396TC14 12-cylinder
diesel engine rated at 1050 kW and LSG-1200-90 generator with
state-of-the-art control electronics. Further modernizations are likely to
follow. In the Czech Republic,
ten machines were also modified and re-designated class 773; they have Caterpillar 3512DI-TA/2 engines rated
at 1300 kW and lowered engine cowlings. Probably all are used by ČD as heavy freight road locomotives.
Slovak modernization (class 772), with Pielstick
8PA4-185M4 engine, rated at 960 kW, and elegant streamlined silhouette, has
probably remained a single example.
Main technical data
|
No.
|
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
|
1.
|
Years
of manufacture
|
-
|
1963 – 1995
|
|
2.
|
Total
built / used in Poland
|
-
|
8200 / 1431)
|
|
3.
|
Axle
arrangement
|
-
|
Co’Co’
|
|
4.
|
Transmission
type
|
-
|
electric
|
|
5.
|
Design
maximum speed
|
km/h
|
90
|
|
6.
|
Prime
mover type
|
-
|
K6S310DR4)
|
|
7.
|
Engine
rating
|
kW/hp
|
993 / 1350
|
|
8.
|
Bore X
stroke
|
mmXmm
|
310 X 360
|
|
9.
|
Number
of cylinders
|
-
|
6
|
|
10.
|
Number of
electric engines
|
-
|
6 X TE006
|
|
11.
|
Rated
output of electric engines
|
kW
|
885
|
|
12.
|
Main
reduction gear ratio
|
-
|
76:152)
|
|
13.
|
Diameter
of drivers
|
mm
|
1050
|
|
14.
|
Total
weight
|
kg
|
115 8003)
|
|
15.
|
Axle
load
|
T
|
19.33)
|
|
16.
|
Axle
base
|
mm
|
12 660
|
|
17.
|
Overall
length
|
mm
|
17 240
|
|
18.
|
Maximum
width
|
mm
|
3 150
|
|
19.
|
Train
heating
|
-
|
-
|
|
20.
|
Brake
type
|
-
|
Oerlikon (?)
|
1) Plus
4 examples not supplied to Poland
2) 73:18
in Soviet machines (ChME3)
3) Some
Czechoslovak versions 114 600 kg and 19.1 T, respectively
4) MTU
8V396TC14 785 kW in the modernized version.
References and acknowledgments
Technical
and historical details can be found in AV vol.2; data for this entry
has been taken mainly from this source.
|